Sorry RINO's - - Democrats are lost. Some Republicans need to be removed. More FISCAL Conservative, Tea Party Candidates. FIRE THEM. Or start 3rd party. Agree? Gonna take more heavy lifting than this ...
WASHINGTON – The Republican-run House has said "no" to the most conservative members who wanted to cut even more than the GOP's budget-cutting bill. The vote Friday was a rare setback for conservatives and their tea party supporters, who were so important to the GOP's election success last fall. By a 281-147 vote, the House refused to cut $22 billion more in domestic programs. The overall bill would cut $60 billion from federal programs in the remaining seven months of the government's current budget year. The defeated proposal would have trimmed 5.5 percent more from domestic programs and 11 percent more from Congress' own budget. Defense and other security programs would have been exempted. Democrats voted no overwhelmingly — and Republicans who also voted that way said the plan went too far.
Rich Michaels Links
Facebook is off-line temporarily ...
Other Rich Websites:
Rich's Main Page. The Alpha
Rich's Offensive Page - may not be suited for Non-Adults
Rich Michaels Productions. Innovative Marketing. Advanced Audio Solutions. Award Winning Advertising & Rich's Creations Recording Studio
Rich Michaels Radio Audio Vault. Radio Show Podcasts and Best of Show!
Showing posts with label conservative. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conservative. Show all posts
Friday, February 18, 2011
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
followup - - OBAMA and 2nd Amendment
Read yesterday's post about the man who went to prison for defending his life and property against repeated burglars ... Sent to Jail for shooting a burglar!!! One leftist complained about how Obama was not after anyone's guns. I didn't say that specifically, but I found more "grist for the mill."
Offthegridnews.com reminds me I was being far too generous. Facts:
Offthegridnews.com reminds me I was being far too generous. Facts:
If the past is any indication of the future, Americans better buckle up for a ride
This administration is no friend of the 2nd amendment. If the past is any indicator of the future, we haven't heard the end of gun-control. For instance:
- Then-Senator Barack Obama refused to sign a friend-of-the-court brief in support of second amendment rights in the Heller case.
- Barack Obama is on record calling for a 500% increase in the federal excise tax on firearms and ammunition.
- Barack Obama is on record endorsing a complete ban on handgun ownership.
- This administration supports gun owner licensing and gun registration.
- This administration has reversed American policy and is now working with the United Nations on global gun-control laws.
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Paranoid? Or OverReach
Conservatives will go Glenn Beck paranoid on this one ...
Libs will act all defensive.
A true Libertarian asks: Why does Washington need or want this kind of power? This is pathetic.
Once I was on the air in Cleveland (1996, on my sabbatical from Lansing:) ), and somebody threw a switch and I was live on every station in town for about 2 minutes.
They have been building this "control system" for years (yes, before Obama) to seize control of every radio and tv transmitter in the "event of a national emergency." Duh ... I don't know why that wasn't done during 9/11, which is about as close to a national emergency as I've ever seen (or ever care to).
What do you make of this?
WASHINGTON: The Federal Communications Commission today approved an order to conduct the first national test of the Emergency Alert System. The commission voted unanimously to adopt a Third Report and Order that sets forth rules for the test, to be initiated by a presidential alert from Washington to TV, radio, cable and satellite systems across the country. No president has ever triggered an emergency alert, and the system has never been tested intentionally.
Libs will act all defensive.
A true Libertarian asks: Why does Washington need or want this kind of power? This is pathetic.
Once I was on the air in Cleveland (1996, on my sabbatical from Lansing:) ), and somebody threw a switch and I was live on every station in town for about 2 minutes.
They have been building this "control system" for years (yes, before Obama) to seize control of every radio and tv transmitter in the "event of a national emergency." Duh ... I don't know why that wasn't done during 9/11, which is about as close to a national emergency as I've ever seen (or ever care to).
What do you make of this?
WASHINGTON: The Federal Communications Commission today approved an order to conduct the first national test of the Emergency Alert System. The commission voted unanimously to adopt a Third Report and Order that sets forth rules for the test, to be initiated by a presidential alert from Washington to TV, radio, cable and satellite systems across the country. No president has ever triggered an emergency alert, and the system has never been tested intentionally.
The Betrayal of Great Britain
I can't let this story go ... what do you think?
- IBD Charts
- MarketSmith
- Stock Checkup
- Screen Center
- Premium Tools
- Options Center
- ETF Center
- IBD Indexes
The Betrayal Of Great Britain
Posted 02/07/2011 05:43 PM ET

HMS Vanguard is Britain's lead Trident-armed submarine. The U.S., under a nuclear deal, has agreed to give the Kremlin the serial numbers of the... View Enlarged Image
According to diplomatic cables obtained by Britain's Daily Telegraph, mined from the thousands of classified documents released by WikiLeaks, the U.S. government agreed to provide Russia with information on the British nuclear deterrent as part of the deal behind the ratification and signing of the New START treaty.
Specifically, the Telegraph reports, the U.S. provided Moscow with the serial numbers of each Trident missile in the British ballistic missile submarine inventory. The Russians presumably already know how many Tridents the British have but can't be sure. British policy has been to refuse to confirm the exact size of its relatively tiny arsenal.
Last year, British Foreign Secretary William Hague disclosed that Britain had "up to 160" warheads operational at any one time, but he did not disclose the total number of missiles and warheads in its nuclear inventory. Duncan Lennox, editor of Jane's Strategic Weapons Systems, says: "They want to find out whether Britain has more missiles than we say we have, and having the unique identifiers might help them."
The State Department denies this, and spokesman P.J. Crowley said via Twitter that the U.S. simply "carried forward requirement to notify Russia about U.S.-UK nuclear cooperation from the 1991 treaty." So why did we, according to the Telegraph, have to ask Britain in 2009 for permission with detailed and classified information on the British Tridents, permission that was reportedly denied?
Indeed, according to one leaked memo, "the Russian Federation will receive unique identifiers for each of the missiles transferred to the UK, which was more information than was disclosed under START." So the State Department seems to have gone above and beyond the call of duty.
The British have quietly gone along with the State Department explanation, but then why wouldn't they? It wouldn't serve the new government of Prime Minister David Cameron well to acknowledge, after a series of snubs and insults from this side of the pond, that the U.S. had just thrown it under the strategic bus.
That we would betray Britain's nuclear secrets would not be surprising, since we are quite willing to betray our own. Before a recent U.N. conference on nuclear nonproliferation, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced: "Beginning today, the United States will make public the number of nuclear weapons in our stockpile and the number of weapons we have dismantled since 1991."
START, both old and new, has disclosure and verification requirements. Yet some secrets are and should be maintained, especially in regard to a historical ally that was not a party to the treaty and wishes to maintain a certain degree of confidentiality.
Our special relationship with Britain seems to have deteriorated into a special animus. Perhaps to this administration it was an inconvenient reminder of the days of Reagan and Thatcher, when the U.S. led the world instead of apologizing to it. It was a day when we and our presidents believed in American exceptionalism, not that at a meeting such as the G-20 we were just one of the gang.
It was President Obama who returned a bust of Winston Churchill loaned to President George W. Bush from the British Government's art collection after the Sept. 11 attacks. During a visit by the president of France, it was President Obama who proclaimed to British chagrin: "We don't have a stronger friend and stronger ally than Nicolas Sarkozy and the French people."
Well, we did. Certainly the British people must be wondering, with friends like these ...
Monday, February 7, 2011
Stopping Islam
Politically Incorrect... so what ... Did I read 80% of Egyptians want Sharia Law? There is no hope for cultural integration with these people. Or history repeats itself and we have another Crusades, which Islam started. What do you think?
In Sevilla, Spain, local people found a way to stop the construction of another mosque in their town.
They buried a pig on the site, and made sure this would be known by the local press.
The Islamic rules forbid the erecting of a Mosque on "pig soiled ground." The Muslims had to cancel
The Islamic rules forbid the erecting of a Mosque on "pig soiled ground." The Muslims had to cancel
the project. This land was sold to them by government officials.
No protests were needed by the local people...and it worked!
No protests were needed by the local people...and it worked!
Friday, February 4, 2011
America. No Friends Left
UNBELIEVABLE!! Post your comments. You have to see this. First Obama insults Great Britain by removing the statue of Churchill from the Oval Office (first of several affronts and Bo has railed on Winston in the past) - - - - JESUS - now Obama gives Russians nuclear sub codes?? WTF???
Anybody?
Comments here?
You don't have to give your name. Stay anonymous. I'm horrified ......
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Bullshit Global Warming
Mexico city sees coldest temperatures in 50 years ...
"Ciudad Juarez mayor Hector Murgia said the temperatures of around minus 13 degrees centigrade (8.6 Fahrenheit) were the lowest recorded in almost 50 years."
Change the headline:
GLOBAL ICE AGE COMING!!!! GIVE US YOUR TAX DOLLARS TO SAVE EARTH!!
"Ciudad Juarez mayor Hector Murgia said the temperatures of around minus 13 degrees centigrade (8.6 Fahrenheit) were the lowest recorded in almost 50 years."
Change the headline:
GLOBAL ICE AGE COMING!!!! GIVE US YOUR TAX DOLLARS TO SAVE EARTH!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)